Our website's columns
are a place for our writers to express opinions and stimulate
dialog about issues important to the
success of Northwest wine.
Please feel free to email or write
us with comments, and we'll publish
them.
Our goal with this website is to popularize NW wines. We
hope to increase sales of NW wine on our site,
to increase sales at our
region's wineries, and across the country in
restaurants and wine shops.
We welcome and encourage feedback and suggestions. --jy
What’s So Screwy
(or is it scary) About Screw Caps?
By Cole Danehower
7/21/04
You know, I used to be like you. “Screw caps!” I said, “I’ll
never give up my trusty cork.” But no more. I have seen the light—or
more accurately, I have tasted the wine. And now I’ve traded in
that crusty old cork for the fresh-fangled reliability of twist
cap enclosures.
photo credit "STELVIN+,
Pechiney-Alcan
Oh, I’ll admit it was tough . . .
like
giving up the buggy whip, the slide rule, the typewriter, and
leaded gas . . . but once I got over
the fanciful notion that there was something inherently romantic
about always wondering if that newly opened cork-closed bottle
would be fresh,
TCA-free, devoid of taint, without excessive ullage, or if it
had shrinking cork syndrome, I learned to love new the new
technology.
Yes, it is true, we have in fact evolved beyond the 3,000 year-old tradition
of cork enclosures. We have invented a more reliable solution: welcome
to the 21st century, the screw cap enclosure is here.
Not that the screw cap is all that new. It was first applied to wines
in the 1970s, but in the late 1990s and especially within the last few
years it has gained a rolling momentum as an alternative to cork-enclosed
wine bottles.
Why is an alternative desirable? Because of the invariable variability
of an organic enclosure such as cork. It has been widely estimated that
between 3% and 10% of all newly released wine will experience a problem
with faults due to cork contamination of one sort or another.
In recent years, cork faults have been perceived as increasing. The rising
demand for cork from the wine industry, it is claimed by some, have led
to a shortage of high quality cork, resulting in a larger percentage of
low-cost corks and concomitant rates of contamination.
In no other industry would an average 7% product failure be considered
tolerable. Yet in wine, we have raised this fault to the status of romance.
Indeed, the very ceremony of opening a bottle
at a fine restaurant exists solely to test whether a bottle
is good or not—and this is called
wine service, and you are expected to pay for it!* Considered objectively,
it is absurd. You don’t expect to have a store clerk open a carton
of milk and pour you a taste to ensure it is fresh before purchasing—why
do we do it with wine?
Cork variability is a headache that consumers
don’t need!
And, by the way, neither do winemakers.
I recall visiting Beaux Frères winery
one day (a highly respected upscale Oregon pinot noir producer),
and was surprised to see over a hundred
clean wax cups filled with cheap white wine, each with a single
cork floating on the wine. Winemaker Michael Etzel and his
assistants were assiduously
sniffing each cup and making notes on a clipboard form.
Mike Etzel
Michael explained to me that they were testing
corks of different types, including such variables as quality,
cost, source, vendor, and processing
method. They were using a bulk white wine as their aroma “control” since
it had straightforward and clean (not oaked) aromas. The corks
had been sitting in the wine overnight in order to get some exposure
time between
the liquid and the solid.
I was surprised—no, I really have to say I was shocked—to
note how distinctly different the aromas rising out of each cup
were. With only the cork as the variable, I could easily smell
the differences between many of the corks, and could just as easily deduce
their
potential
effects on wine left in a cellar for even a few years.
My eyes were beginning to open.
Recently, they were opened even wider. As part of a series of Oregon
white wine tastings for my newsletter (Oregon Wine Report), I received
as samples two bottles each of Pinot gris and Pinot blanc, each wine in
screw cap and cork-enclosed formats from WillaKenzie Estates. What a great
opportunity, I thought to test the efficacy of each enclosure (at least
for these fruit forward white wines).
I tasted each blindly, and had no trouble
picking out the screw capped wine—t was just that little bit fresher.
There was nothing at all wrong with the cork-closed wines,
they just seemed a skosh more closed.
Cork has been used to store wine since the
days of clay amphora. One of it’s most important supposed benefits is that is allows a controlled
passage of oxygen into the wine, contributing to its evolution in the
bottle. Yet there are studies that call into question the reality of this
phenomenon. The great French oenologist Emile Peynaud has said that the
perfect cork would create a perfect airtight seal—something that
cork essentially does not do.
Yet screw caps can do either. While the idea
is to create a true airtight seal, there is also technology
that allows for controlled “gas permeability” in
screw tops in order to help with ageing. Even so, the entire process of
air exchange is controversial, and most, if not all, of the processes
believed to involve wine’s maturation in the bottle are anerobic.
It is fair to say that the true ageability of wine in screw tops is not
yet known. Indeed, a recent study by Hogue Cellars, the first rigorous
study by a winery to be publicly revealed, showed that the benefits of
fruit retention in the screw caps were more clear in the Chardonnay then
the Merlot. With white wines generally being consumed earlier then reds,
the case for freshness and purity of fruit shown by the screw caps seems
a closed case for early drinking whites.
So yes, the case for long maturing reds would still seem to be open.
But knowing the winemakers of the Pacific Northwest as I do, if any one
of them offered for sale their highest end product in a screw cap, I would
unhesitatingly buy the wine and plan on storing it in my cellar.
I mean, what’s the ultimate risk? Too well, I remember the sad
case of my New Year’s Eve, 1999.
As my now wife and I counted the minutes toward
the new millennium, I went down to my cellar where some days
before I had selected the proper
wine and set it upright to gather the sediment at the bottom.
With reverence I brought up the 1974 Heitz Martha’s Vineyard
Cabernet Sauvignon I had saved since release.
With care I removed the foil capsule and revealed an appropriately aged-looking
cork: some dirt, some mold, some red staining . . . nothing out of the
ordinary for such an old wine. Gently, I prodded the tip of a corkscrew
into the soft cork . . . and with a sickening ease the cork itself started
sliding down into the bottle before I could even get a single twist into
it.
Long ago, my cork had shrunk (despite the bottle being always stored
on its side). Who knows how long I had been supporting big expectations
with nothing more than vinegar.
Luckily, I had a back up: 1976 Diamond Creek Cabernet Sauvignon, Red
Rock Terrace. Repeating the procedure, I was relieved to see what seemed
a solid seal in the cork, as my corkscrew gripped nicely and the cork
removed with appropriate resistance.
But I was to be disappointed again. This time the wine smelled and tasted
like . . . moldy cork. It was the essence of what we call corked wine.
Wine should not be such a risky proposition, and screw caps help take
the risk out of wine.
But there are many of us who resist. We just
can’t get over the
sense that a screw cap means cheap wine (tell that to the owners of Plumpjack
bottles!), or that we will lose something if we don’t hear the pop
of a cork.
Well, I suppose there are also folks who still
feel Port and cigars are the exclusive province of men. Innovation
is trying; progress is tough.
But as my wife likes to tell me in other contexts: “Get over it!”
And I have. For my intermediate drinking (now
out to 5 years) I have no qualms at all about screw-capped
bottles. For my long-term ageing,
it is a toss up. When my favorite wineries start selling their
wines in screw tops—even their $65 Pinot noirs—I’ll grab those
bottles first. I don’t want any more dodgy corks ruining my next
New Years’s Eve celebration!
photo credit "STELVIN+, Pechiney-Alcan
_________
*Yes, I realize wine service includes the expertise of the sommelier,
the good glasses, and storing the wine, and monitoring the table to keep
glasses full, and so forth. I have no problem compensating a restaurant
for that . . . but I do balk at paying merely for what is essentially
a quality control test.
Frequently
Asked Questions
about Screwcaps
Can I store my bottles on their side?
Yes. Upright, on its side or with the neck facing downwards, the bottle can be
stored and transported in all positions.
Does the wine come into contact with
the aluminum in the screwcap?
No, the liner is in contact,
and is totally neutral.
What are the advantages of the screwcap closure?
The capsule can conserve the qualities, bouquet and the fragrances of the
wine thanks to perfect water tightness, controlled gas permeability and,
above all, an absence of TCA.
Moreover, the practicality of the bottle is improved by easy opening and
resealing; You can also transport and store your bottle in any position.
What is TCA? Trichloroanisole
(TCA) is the natural compound that at higher levels can impart “musty” flavors
and aromas to wines, other beverages and foods. Wines that contain TCA at a
detectable level are described as either
being ‘corked' or having “corkiness.”
Cork is a major source
of TCA in bottled wine, although experts indicate that TCA in wine may be
derived from sources other than cork, such as from
barrels
or other sources of wood.
TCA is the common abbreviation for the chemical
compound 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, the first identified and thought to be a primary
cause of cork taint. Other chloroanisole contaminants of wine may include 2,3,4,6-tetrachloroanisole
(TeCA) and pentachlo-
roanisole (PCA). Scientists in Bordeaux, France, using gas chromatography and
mass spectrometry, have recently isolated another compound, 2,4,6-tribromoanisole
(TBA), that similarly ruins wine aromas.
Regardless of the source or chemical identity, Cork Taint imparts a very unpleasant
smell that, depending upon its severity, tends to dominate all other aroma
characteristics of any wine it contaminates. The Australian Wine Research Institute
conducted experiments in early 2003, that demonstrated even a very low level
of contamination, as little as one or two nanograms per litre, suppresses positive
fruit aroma character in wine by as much as 50%.
As with all aromas, individuals vary in their threshold ability to detect
the presence and strength of Cork Taint, as well as their tolerance for it;
experience can increase sensitivity. The human threshold for detection is generally
considered to be above 5 nanograms per litre.
Damage to the wine industry annually from Cork Taint is estimated to be $10billion
worldwide. A reliable process has been developed to detect and remove TCA from
wine before it is bottled.
While TCA can be detected in corks, however, there is of yet no proven method
to remove it from this source. This presents both a complex challenge to wine
science and mutual frustrations to the wine and cork industries. Experiments
are ongoing to prevent or purge TCA from corks, using alternative chemical
treatments, steam, gas emersion, microwaving, etc.
Cork taint can most accurately be described as "moldy" or "musty" or "earthy" or
sometimes "medicinal" smell that masks or dominates the fruit aroma
of wine and reduces the overall wine quality. The source may be one or more
particular chemical compounds formed by a reaction between molds and chemicals.
Infected wines are said to be "corked" or "corky" and
the contaminant often referred to as "cork taint", although there
are many other possible sources besides corks for its presence in wine.
Molds may be originally present in raw cork bark or in wood used for barrels
or other winery equipment or facilities, or can infect cork or wood in storage.
Ironically, the chemicals which react with the molds are introduced by methods
and equipment used for keeping the production environment sterile and safe.
One culprit is chlorine bleach used in cork processing
and also as a routine disinfectant in wineries. Another is atmospheric pollution
by off-gassing from
plastic equipment, from treatments such as flame-retardants, or simply from
old wooden buildings that have absorbed these pollutants over time.